With so many Americans currently out of work, falling behind on their bills, and losing their homes the demand for help has never been greater. But that desperation brings out the low-lifes who prey on innocent victims. Like a shark that smells blood, credit counseling scammers come out of the woodwork to prey on desperate families. Don't be one of them! Companies that require fees and money, sometimes thousands of dollars up front to help you through your financial crisis are SCAMMERS! If you had the money you wouldn't be struggling!
The Consumer Credit Counseling Service is a nationwide, non-profit service that offers FREE assistance. They can contact your creditors on your behalf and negotiate better rates, better terms, and possibly restructure loans, depending on the circumstances. You need to contact the main number to make an appointment with your local office. Appointments can be by phone or in person, but they really can help! I know people who have used the service. One person had the interest rates for two of her credit card accounts reduced from 26% & 27% to 6% & 7% respectively.
Another was able to consolidate all of her debt into one low-interest loan, received debt counseling (for free), and has worked out a payment plan to eliminate all the debt. Their phone lines are open 24 hours a day. Just be prepared to hold because demand for help is overwhelming. Trust me when I tell you the call is worth the wait! Their website is http://www.nfcc.org/ or you can call 800-388-2227.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Healthcare Reform Snafu
I must say I was really surprised to learn about the latest snafu with regard to the proposed healthcare reform currently being debated by our legislators. It is my understanding that abortion may possibly be a covered expense under the plan. I mention this not to inflame anti-abortion readers but instead as an observation.
All the good intentions in the world are not going to push through a healthcare plan that includes abortion. No matter where you stand on the issue, abortion is such a divisive issue among Americans to even suggest including it in a national healthcare bill is just plain foolish. I don't believe that even if we had a plan that offered healthcare to all, at no cost to our country, curing all diseases in the world, with unlimited funding available to pay for it all, that it would get congressional approval if it also pays for abortion.
Right now we have existing plans that pay for viagra but consider treatment for port wine stains on a child's face to be elective or annual pap tests to be unnecessary. To say that the need for viagra is a medical necessity is preposterous. Those wishing to use viagra or obtain an abortion (except if the mother's life is in danger) should pay out of pocket as these are elective treatments. Just like cosmetic surgery these are optional and should be considered as such. To roll them into a national plan is just asking for a fight.
There's enough propaganda flying around already trying to convince people that the government will decide who lives and who dies under the new plan (not true, of course). Ironically enough, that's what insurance companies do now. They decide which medical procedures are allowed and which are not. It's not as if the doctor caring for his/her patient has any idea what is best for the patient, right? For those that cannot pay for necessary procedures, they go without OR THEY DIE. I regularly help people access the care they need or connect them to agencies that can help. Often, the help comes too late.
Some people are spreading rumors that Medicare will be cut. Seniors around the country are up in arms spreading this message without even attempting to learn the truth. But people believe it. I watched the Healthcare Summit. It is my understanding that only Medicare Advantage would be affected. If people want to keep the 'premium' Medicare, let them pay the difference. Otherwise, regular Medicare will still be available to all. Our country is full of gullible fools that will believe anything anyone tells them. Those that prey on the elderly to spread their lies should be ashamed of themselves.
The truth is, everyone should have access to medical care. Not just the wealthy. Not just our congressmen. Not just government or municipal workers. Not just those that work for big business. Too many people are without any healthcare and too many have minimal coverage, leading them to go without healthcare. This I know is true. Small business owners who create the majority of the jobs in our country, and therefore employ the majority of the employees in this country cannot afford healthcare for their own families, let alone for their staff. These are real people. You do the math.
I think our legislators need to rethink their proposals before spending time and taxpayer dollars on a battle that may never be won because of small details such as these. We need coverage for all. Too many American citizens do NOT receive care. How about we think these things through before we start voting on them? Just a thought.
All the good intentions in the world are not going to push through a healthcare plan that includes abortion. No matter where you stand on the issue, abortion is such a divisive issue among Americans to even suggest including it in a national healthcare bill is just plain foolish. I don't believe that even if we had a plan that offered healthcare to all, at no cost to our country, curing all diseases in the world, with unlimited funding available to pay for it all, that it would get congressional approval if it also pays for abortion.
Right now we have existing plans that pay for viagra but consider treatment for port wine stains on a child's face to be elective or annual pap tests to be unnecessary. To say that the need for viagra is a medical necessity is preposterous. Those wishing to use viagra or obtain an abortion (except if the mother's life is in danger) should pay out of pocket as these are elective treatments. Just like cosmetic surgery these are optional and should be considered as such. To roll them into a national plan is just asking for a fight.
There's enough propaganda flying around already trying to convince people that the government will decide who lives and who dies under the new plan (not true, of course). Ironically enough, that's what insurance companies do now. They decide which medical procedures are allowed and which are not. It's not as if the doctor caring for his/her patient has any idea what is best for the patient, right? For those that cannot pay for necessary procedures, they go without OR THEY DIE. I regularly help people access the care they need or connect them to agencies that can help. Often, the help comes too late.
Some people are spreading rumors that Medicare will be cut. Seniors around the country are up in arms spreading this message without even attempting to learn the truth. But people believe it. I watched the Healthcare Summit. It is my understanding that only Medicare Advantage would be affected. If people want to keep the 'premium' Medicare, let them pay the difference. Otherwise, regular Medicare will still be available to all. Our country is full of gullible fools that will believe anything anyone tells them. Those that prey on the elderly to spread their lies should be ashamed of themselves.
The truth is, everyone should have access to medical care. Not just the wealthy. Not just our congressmen. Not just government or municipal workers. Not just those that work for big business. Too many people are without any healthcare and too many have minimal coverage, leading them to go without healthcare. This I know is true. Small business owners who create the majority of the jobs in our country, and therefore employ the majority of the employees in this country cannot afford healthcare for their own families, let alone for their staff. These are real people. You do the math.
I think our legislators need to rethink their proposals before spending time and taxpayer dollars on a battle that may never be won because of small details such as these. We need coverage for all. Too many American citizens do NOT receive care. How about we think these things through before we start voting on them? Just a thought.
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Moral Character
Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character.
~Margaret Chase Smith
Monday, February 22, 2010
New Credit Card Law Takes Effect
The new credit card legislation that goes into effect today was designed to help consumers from unscrupulous business practices on the part of banks. And while the new regulations offer some improvement for consumers, as usual, it falls short of truly offering consumer protection.
One big shortfall of the new legislation: there is no interest cap. Legislators claim this was a compromise. My question is, a compromise with whom? Because banks base the interest rates on the prime rate PLUS a percentage, I would like to know why that number couldn't be capped? I suspect the compromise had to be with banks or the lobbyists. Who else could oppose a cap?
If the legislators themselves are in opposition to protecting American consumers against rate gouging, I suggest they get out of office, as it is clear they are not there on our behalf. In my opinion, there is no reason any company should be able to charge 25%, 26%, and 27% interest on consumer credit, but they do. This is tantamount to loan-sharking. And often, it's college-age kids or those with poor credit that get raped with these kinds of rates. Any consumer being charged these kinds of outrageous rates has no hope of ever paying off the balance as it continues to accrue day by day.
Banks can also start charging annual fees or non-usage fees if they want. By allowing these types of loopholes, the law simply becomes a shell game for the banks. They will just find new ways to stick it to the consumer. Long before the legislation was enacted they were working on strategies to get around the law. The economic collapse of our country can be placed squarely on the shoulders of big banks.
Yes, there are positives to the legislation. For example, starting today if you transfer a balance at a lower, introductory rate but you already have an existing balance on your account only the minimum payment will automatically be applied to the balance with the lower rate. In addition, any amount over the minimum payment will be applied to the balance with the higher interest rate. This is good news for consumers.
In the past, if you had a balance on your credit card and transferred an additional balance over to your account at a lower rate, all payments would pay down the lower rate first while the balance with the higher rate would continue to compound.
Another piece of the legislation that works in the consumers' favor is that banks can no longer raise rates within the first year the account is opened. They also cannot raise rates arbitrarily on an account just because you missed or were late on a payment on another.
Much like during and after the Depression, I think this recession is going to have lasting repercussions for big banks. Their own irresponsible, greedy, and in some case malicious behavior is going to come back to bite them. It may take some years before consumers are financially in a place for it to happen, but once consumers can get on their feet the backlash will be swift and severe.
Even after the huge taxpayer (yes, big banks, don't forget that) bailout, they went right back to business as usual, continuing to payout huge bonuses, raise rates on consumers arbitrarily, and reduce credit lines for good customers who had never been late on their payments. Essentially, they spit in the eye of every American taxpayer.
Banks that make an effort to treat their customers fairly and with respect will be the ones that survive. Big banks that have forgotten that without customers they have nothing will be the first to go. And they will have no-one to blame but themselves. When they fail, I think there will be a lot of smug taxpayers watching them go down in flames with smirks on their faces.
One big shortfall of the new legislation: there is no interest cap. Legislators claim this was a compromise. My question is, a compromise with whom? Because banks base the interest rates on the prime rate PLUS a percentage, I would like to know why that number couldn't be capped? I suspect the compromise had to be with banks or the lobbyists. Who else could oppose a cap?
If the legislators themselves are in opposition to protecting American consumers against rate gouging, I suggest they get out of office, as it is clear they are not there on our behalf. In my opinion, there is no reason any company should be able to charge 25%, 26%, and 27% interest on consumer credit, but they do. This is tantamount to loan-sharking. And often, it's college-age kids or those with poor credit that get raped with these kinds of rates. Any consumer being charged these kinds of outrageous rates has no hope of ever paying off the balance as it continues to accrue day by day.
Banks can also start charging annual fees or non-usage fees if they want. By allowing these types of loopholes, the law simply becomes a shell game for the banks. They will just find new ways to stick it to the consumer. Long before the legislation was enacted they were working on strategies to get around the law. The economic collapse of our country can be placed squarely on the shoulders of big banks.
Yes, there are positives to the legislation. For example, starting today if you transfer a balance at a lower, introductory rate but you already have an existing balance on your account only the minimum payment will automatically be applied to the balance with the lower rate. In addition, any amount over the minimum payment will be applied to the balance with the higher interest rate. This is good news for consumers.
In the past, if you had a balance on your credit card and transferred an additional balance over to your account at a lower rate, all payments would pay down the lower rate first while the balance with the higher rate would continue to compound.
Another piece of the legislation that works in the consumers' favor is that banks can no longer raise rates within the first year the account is opened. They also cannot raise rates arbitrarily on an account just because you missed or were late on a payment on another.
Much like during and after the Depression, I think this recession is going to have lasting repercussions for big banks. Their own irresponsible, greedy, and in some case malicious behavior is going to come back to bite them. It may take some years before consumers are financially in a place for it to happen, but once consumers can get on their feet the backlash will be swift and severe.
Even after the huge taxpayer (yes, big banks, don't forget that) bailout, they went right back to business as usual, continuing to payout huge bonuses, raise rates on consumers arbitrarily, and reduce credit lines for good customers who had never been late on their payments. Essentially, they spit in the eye of every American taxpayer.
Banks that make an effort to treat their customers fairly and with respect will be the ones that survive. Big banks that have forgotten that without customers they have nothing will be the first to go. And they will have no-one to blame but themselves. When they fail, I think there will be a lot of smug taxpayers watching them go down in flames with smirks on their faces.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Enough About Tiger Already!
I can't believe it but the media is still talking about Tiger and picking apart his "apology" trying to analyze whether or not he's sincere. Again, let me say for the record, NO-ONE CARES. The public doesn't care. In fact, everyone I know groans whenever his name is mentioned. Enough already! Want to make sure he is "cured"? I hear castration works pretty well. At least that's what they did back in the day before "sex addiction" clinics existed. If the media doesn't put an end to this constant drivel and ridiculous coverage, the general population will experience learned aversion to his name. I think it's starting already. Now, whenever I hear his name I feel nauseous. I dunno. Maybe that's what they're going for...
Friday, February 19, 2010
Aggressive Drivers
Every morning as I drive to work, I’m reminded of just how harried our lives are nowadays. I try to allow myself extra drive time so I don’t feel the need to rush. I make a conscious effort not to drive aggressively and be courteous to others on the road. But I know how easy it is to get caught up in the aggressive culture of commuting.
You may be wondering who cares? When I am driving alone, in the off chance other drivers do something to aggravate me, it doesn’t really matter if I mutter something less than ‘G-rated’…but what about when the kids are in the car?
Are you an aggressive driver? Do you let other peoples’ rude on-road driving affect the way you drive? Do you respond aggressively or verbally? If so, keep in mind that your kids are ever mindful of your behavior. If your kids regularly see you respond in anger to a driver that inadvertently cut you off, or you pretend not to see someone desperately trying to merge, what lesson are you teaching your kids?
My kids are older. Three of four are already driving. I fully believe that our actions speak louder than words. By being a courteous driver at all times, I hope that my children will do the same when they are on the road. Occasionally, I will slip and get annoyed with other drivers, but I make a conscious effort not to respond in kind by behaving aggressively or irresponsibly. I hope you’ll do the same. This is a lesson I hope my children and yours remember every time they get behind the wheel of a car.
You may be wondering who cares? When I am driving alone, in the off chance other drivers do something to aggravate me, it doesn’t really matter if I mutter something less than ‘G-rated’…but what about when the kids are in the car?
Are you an aggressive driver? Do you let other peoples’ rude on-road driving affect the way you drive? Do you respond aggressively or verbally? If so, keep in mind that your kids are ever mindful of your behavior. If your kids regularly see you respond in anger to a driver that inadvertently cut you off, or you pretend not to see someone desperately trying to merge, what lesson are you teaching your kids?
My kids are older. Three of four are already driving. I fully believe that our actions speak louder than words. By being a courteous driver at all times, I hope that my children will do the same when they are on the road. Occasionally, I will slip and get annoyed with other drivers, but I make a conscious effort not to respond in kind by behaving aggressively or irresponsibly. I hope you’ll do the same. This is a lesson I hope my children and yours remember every time they get behind the wheel of a car.
TIGER WOODS BREAKS HIS SILENCE
Listen up, people. Tiger Woods apologizing to the public for infidelity is NOT news. In fact, I find the attention the media has given his family's very personal crisis to be disgraceful and voyeuristic. I interact with people from all walks of life on a daily basis and from a completely unscientific standpoint can attest to the fact that the average person doesn't feel the need to know who Tiger is having sex with or why. In fact, I think most people could care less about Tiger. Instead, their sympathies lie with his wife who has been forced to live out this very private, painful situation in the media.
For those who are insulted by his refusal to answer questions when he "apologizes to the public", get over it. He doesn't owe anyone but his family an apology. It's not my business, it's not your business, and it's not the media's business who, what, where, when, or why this happened. It's a personal matter between a husband and wife. Given the opportunity, the media would no doubt ask specifics that are no-one's business in an effort to get an outrageous sound bite. Did we ever need to know about Monica Lewinsky's affinity for cigars? I think not.
For those that have chosen to 'boycott' the so-called announcement, how ridiculous is that? Talk about cutting off your own nose to spite your face? For those that make their living on the coat-tails of the famous, who exactly are you hurting by refusing to attend? If you think you are making some grand statement about your integrity, think again. I don't mean to insult anyone. I just want our media to rethink the importance they place on 'non-issues' such as this. Stop jamming it down the viewers' throats with endless, repetitive coverage.
Seeing random psychologists talking about "the kind of father we want Tiger to be" and how he must actively participate in his therapy to heal is just plain stupid. Does Tiger care what kind of mother I am? Of course not. Does he care how well you do your job? Don't be ridiculous. Do I feel for his wife? I sure do. Do I care what Tiger does or doesn't do? Not even a little bit. Just because the world knows someone's name doesn't give us the right to pry in their personal (pardon the pun) affairs. I've got one word for you: NUNYA. It's 'nunya' business.
For those that feel the day he has chosen to make the announcement is a slap in the face to the players and sponsors of the current golf tournament, get real. I understand that golf is important to those that make their livings playing golf, for the sponsors of the tournaments, for the advertisers, and for the staff involved with the actual tournaments, but in the real world, there are so many issues that really are NEWS.
Like the devastation in Haiti, or the millions of Americans that are out of work, under-employed, uninsured, or have lost their homes. How about the fact that the government bailout went to big banks who continue to payout huge bonuses while our senior citizens and the dying cannot get a caregiver to be with them when they need it most because Medicare doesn't cover custodial care?
How about corporate big-wigs that freeze cost-of-living raises for poorly paid workers, using the bad economy as an excuse while at the same time gloating about record profits for the company and enjoying lavish vacations? They do this while their workers seek oil and food assistance and stuggle to pay their mortgages. What about the struggles our returning soldiers are facing emotionally, physically, and financially? How about the fact that soldiers are dying in wars around the world at the hands of terrorists? Or the mother of three who is being treated for cancer and is being hounded by bill collectors because she can't work?
What about the ever-increasing cost of college? In an effort to get an education that would allow them to support themselves as adults most students walk out of school with a $30,000-$100,000 piece of paper with no job offers on the table. This is NEWS, people. These are real issues. These are real people with real struggles in the real world. The fact that Tiger can't keep it in his pants is not news. Instead of sensationalizing his wife's very personal pain, how about we start bringing attention to the real issues? If I see any more coverage about an athlete that has "betrayed" their fans, I think I will throw up. Move on. Please.
The media is made up of professional journalists and those that make their living off of the pain and humiliation of public figures just because they can. I personally don't confuse the two. Sensationalism is not news. The paparazzi are not journalists. Their motivation is not to educate the public or to cover important issues. Their motivation is greed. Journalists cover the news. Let's get back to covering the news. Please?
For those who are insulted by his refusal to answer questions when he "apologizes to the public", get over it. He doesn't owe anyone but his family an apology. It's not my business, it's not your business, and it's not the media's business who, what, where, when, or why this happened. It's a personal matter between a husband and wife. Given the opportunity, the media would no doubt ask specifics that are no-one's business in an effort to get an outrageous sound bite. Did we ever need to know about Monica Lewinsky's affinity for cigars? I think not.
For those that have chosen to 'boycott' the so-called announcement, how ridiculous is that? Talk about cutting off your own nose to spite your face? For those that make their living on the coat-tails of the famous, who exactly are you hurting by refusing to attend? If you think you are making some grand statement about your integrity, think again. I don't mean to insult anyone. I just want our media to rethink the importance they place on 'non-issues' such as this. Stop jamming it down the viewers' throats with endless, repetitive coverage.
Seeing random psychologists talking about "the kind of father we want Tiger to be" and how he must actively participate in his therapy to heal is just plain stupid. Does Tiger care what kind of mother I am? Of course not. Does he care how well you do your job? Don't be ridiculous. Do I feel for his wife? I sure do. Do I care what Tiger does or doesn't do? Not even a little bit. Just because the world knows someone's name doesn't give us the right to pry in their personal (pardon the pun) affairs. I've got one word for you: NUNYA. It's 'nunya' business.
For those that feel the day he has chosen to make the announcement is a slap in the face to the players and sponsors of the current golf tournament, get real. I understand that golf is important to those that make their livings playing golf, for the sponsors of the tournaments, for the advertisers, and for the staff involved with the actual tournaments, but in the real world, there are so many issues that really are NEWS.
Like the devastation in Haiti, or the millions of Americans that are out of work, under-employed, uninsured, or have lost their homes. How about the fact that the government bailout went to big banks who continue to payout huge bonuses while our senior citizens and the dying cannot get a caregiver to be with them when they need it most because Medicare doesn't cover custodial care?
How about corporate big-wigs that freeze cost-of-living raises for poorly paid workers, using the bad economy as an excuse while at the same time gloating about record profits for the company and enjoying lavish vacations? They do this while their workers seek oil and food assistance and stuggle to pay their mortgages. What about the struggles our returning soldiers are facing emotionally, physically, and financially? How about the fact that soldiers are dying in wars around the world at the hands of terrorists? Or the mother of three who is being treated for cancer and is being hounded by bill collectors because she can't work?
What about the ever-increasing cost of college? In an effort to get an education that would allow them to support themselves as adults most students walk out of school with a $30,000-$100,000 piece of paper with no job offers on the table. This is NEWS, people. These are real issues. These are real people with real struggles in the real world. The fact that Tiger can't keep it in his pants is not news. Instead of sensationalizing his wife's very personal pain, how about we start bringing attention to the real issues? If I see any more coverage about an athlete that has "betrayed" their fans, I think I will throw up. Move on. Please.
The media is made up of professional journalists and those that make their living off of the pain and humiliation of public figures just because they can. I personally don't confuse the two. Sensationalism is not news. The paparazzi are not journalists. Their motivation is not to educate the public or to cover important issues. Their motivation is greed. Journalists cover the news. Let's get back to covering the news. Please?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)